Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Laura Siegemund vs Alycia Parks Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siegemund vs Parks analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Laura Siegemund vs Alycia Parks Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siegemund 0 - 0 Parks
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siegemund has won 47.53% of points on their second serve, while Parks has won 42.9%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siegemund, in recent form, has won 57.73% of their opponent's second serve points, while Parks has won 50.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.06% and 36.06% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siegemund has saved 53.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Parks has saved 50.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siegemund has won 64.58% of matches played (W/L 31/ 17), with Parks winning 42.86% (W/L 21/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siegemund has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 339/ 181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 12/ 12). Parks has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 57/ 70).
- Player level: In the last year, Siegemund has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/ 7), where as Parks has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 10/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siegemund has played against opponents with an average rank of 186.73 while Parks has played against players with an average rank of 142.2.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siegemund has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Parks has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siegemund has converted 49.24% of breakpoint opportunities, and Parks has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
73
Rank
27
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
121
Rank
40
High
23
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
60% (516-348)
Career Total W/L
49% (168-175)
58% (18-13)
YTD W/L
43% (12-16)
$2,591,621
Career Prize Money
$730,272
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Laura Siegemund vs Alycia Parks For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Siegemund VS Parks
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Laura Siegemund | Alycia Parks |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (18/13) | 43% (12/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (43/34) | 41% (26/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (379/344) | 46% (266/307) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 22% (2/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (11/6) | 14% (1/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 90% (9/1) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.68 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 193 |
| DFs per game | 0.22 | 0.82 |
| DFs Total | 79 | 231 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:11:34 | 1:34:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 154.45 | 150.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 75% (1758/2345) | 52% (991/1893) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (994/1758) | 68% (670/991) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (279/587) | 43% (387/902) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (163/331) | 45% (81/180) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (1168/2435) | 41% (730/1786) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 75% (6/2) |
| Masters W/L | 60% (9/6) | 0% (0/6) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 55% (6/5) | 0% (0/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (18/31) | 43% (12/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 53% (8/15) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (16/12) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (16/4) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 40% (15/6) | 17% (18/3) |
Laura Siegemund Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Lauren Davis
Player
Laura Siegemund
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
46 of
72)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sofia Kenin
Player
Laura Siegemund
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Viktoriya Tomova
Player
Laura Siegemund
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
53 of
72)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano
78%
(
64 of
82)
1st Serve %
74%
(
69 of
93)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
8
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Anna Blinkova
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
32 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Laura Siegemund
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
75%
(
62 of
83)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
43 of
83)
97
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Maria Lourdes Carle
82%
(
72 of
88)
1st Serve %
85%
(
77 of
91)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
42 of
77)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Julia Riera
77%
(
65 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
45%
(
38 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Laura Siegemund
Player
Beatrice Ricci
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
60)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Laura Siegemund
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
78%
(
39 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Alycia Parks Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Hannah Klugman
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Tereza Martincova
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
12
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Katarzyna Kawa
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
64%
(
16 of
25)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Bernarda Pera
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
5
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Susan Bandecchi
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve %
67%
(
55 of
82)
5
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Robin Montgomery
48%
(
52 of
109)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
101)
17
Aces
3
16
Double Faults
7
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
50 of
70)
60%
(
34 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
35 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
110
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Anca Alexia Todoni
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Elvina Kalieva
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
79)
21
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
2
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alycia Parks
Player
Anna Siskova
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
13
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
43 of
68)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Alycia Parks
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Siegemund Vs Parks Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Siegemund are available here and Parks photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Laura Siegemund
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Alycia Parks
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
